Publication summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WPSU results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 130 hits . Analysis detected 1,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 63% (218 of 584 publications). This WPSU is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,652
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst