Publication summary
48% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WFAE 90.7 - Charlotte's NPR News Source results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,001 hits . Analysis detected 5,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,080 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (316 of 584 publications). This WFAE 90.7 - Charlotte's NPR News Source is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group. WFAE 90.7 - Charlotte's NPR News Source Publication details
Total words: 10,080
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst