Publication summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These vtcng.com results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , False Dilemma , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 527 hits . Analysis detected 2,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,944 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 84% (97 of 584 publications). This vtcng.com is worse (more manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,944
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 17.9% 17.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.2% 1.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Publication 6.9% 6.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 17.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Publication 6.9%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst