Publication summary
â 48% 1 analyzed article/video 597 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KWQC results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 228 hits . Analysis detected 1,686 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of â 79% (126 of 575 publications). This KWQC is worse (more manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,388
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 0.4% Blind-Spot Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst