Publication summary
26% 1 analyzed article/video 465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jefferson Public Radio results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 344 hits . Analysis detected 2,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 79% (124 of 584 publications). This Jefferson Public Radio is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,848
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 12.1% 12.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Publication 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Publication 12.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 7.3%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst