Publication summary
7% 1 analyzed article/video 905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Healio results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 248 hits . Analysis detected 1,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (322 of 582 publications). This Healio is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,620
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 0.7% Burden of Proof: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst