Publication summary
51% 13 analyzed articles/videos 22,317 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Floodlight results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 7,770 hits . Analysis detected 48,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 98,675 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 18% (459 of 556 publications). This Floodlight is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 98,675
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.5% percentile 0.9% BS Score13 analyzed articles98.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst