Publication summary
80%1 analyzed article/video736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These www.cities929.com results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 307 hits. Analysis detected 2,379 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,944 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 83% (105 of 584 publications). This www.cities929.com is worse (more manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group.
www.cities929.com
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%Just Security1%
1%Greenville News1%
83%www.cities929.com (selected)3%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%Lookout12%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 2,944
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

82% percentile
025507510082.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 1.6%1.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Publication 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos