Publication summary
99% 51 analyzed articles/videos 16,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Breaking Points results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 22,468 hits . Analysis detected 251,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 88,258 analyzed words across 51 videos, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 96% (23 of 548 publications). This Breaking Points is worse (more manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 88,258
Video count: 51
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.0% percentile 5.3% BS Score51 analyzed articles88.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 22.3% 22.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 22.6% 22.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 16.0% 16.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Publication 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 25.5% 25.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Publication 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 21.9% 21.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Publication 7.3% 7.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Publication 7.2% 7.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 25.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Publication 22.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 22.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 21.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Publication 12.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 10.0%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Publication 7.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 7.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 0.4% Special Pleading: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 0.3% Anchoring Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst