Keyword summary
84%2 analyzed articles/videos604 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wor T Girl In America results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Recency Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 685 hits. Analysis detected 2,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,624 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (21,456 of 55,305 keywords). This Wor T Girl In America is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Wor T Girl In America
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
62%Wor T Girl In America (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,624
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.9%18.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 17.0%17.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos