Keyword summary
25% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,071 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Woodside Fire results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , In-Group Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 205 hits . Analysis detected 1,718 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,284 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (50,864 of 59,653 keywords). This Woodside Fire is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group. Woodside Fire
Keyword details
Total words: 4,284
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTVU 26% 7/31/2026, 5:11:42 PM