Keyword summary
81% 7 analyzed articles/videos 6,255 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women's Rights results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 2,988 hits . Analysis detected 24,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,552 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (41,324 of 56,713 keywords). This Women's Rights is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Women's Rights
Keyword details
Total words: 27,552
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles27.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst