Keyword summary
48% 1 analyzed article/video 520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wisconsin Hospital Association results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 140 hits . Analysis detected 1,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 51% (26,902 of 53,982 keywords). This Wisconsin Hospital Association is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Wisconsin Hospital Association
Keyword details
Total words: 2,080
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.1% Straw Man: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst