Keyword summary
46% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,244 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wisconsin Ethics Commission results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 245 hits . Analysis detected 2,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,976 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (48,900 of 57,438 keywords). This Wisconsin Ethics Commission is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group. Wisconsin Ethics Commission
Keyword details
Total words: 4,976
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst