Keyword summary
69% 1 analyzed article/video 562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Whoopi Goldberg results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 330 hits . Analysis detected 1,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 67% (19,266 of 58,223 keywords). This Whoopi Goldberg is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group. Whoopi Goldberg
Keyword details
Total words: 2,248
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst