Keyword summary
85% 12 analyzed articles/videos 4,760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Republican Party results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 2,948 hits . Analysis detected 24,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,631 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 25% (39,958 of 53,020 keywords). This Utah Republican Party is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group. Utah Republican Party
Keyword details
Total words: 28,631
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score12 analyzed articles28.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst