Keyword summary
68% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,895 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah 3rd Congressional District results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 1,244 hits . Analysis detected 13,345 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,612 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (43,338 of 53,057 keywords). This Utah 3rd Congressional District is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group. Utah 3rd Congressional District
Keyword details
Total words: 18,612
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst