Keyword summary
84% 18 analyzed articles/videos 10,296 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah 1st Congressional District results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 4,883 hits . Analysis detected 58,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 72,625 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (44,840 of 54,442 keywords). This Utah 1st Congressional District is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. Utah 1st Congressional District
Keyword details
Total words: 72,625
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score18 analyzed articles72.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst