Keyword summary
95%2 analyzed articles/videos1,630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Fish And Wildlife Service results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 1,345 hits. Analysis detected 8,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,520 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 77% (13,722 of 57,694 keywords). This US Fish And Wildlife Service is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
US Fish And Wildlife Service
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
77%US Fish And Wildlife Service (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,520
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510076.2% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.3%15.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.4%5.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 20.6%20.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos