Keyword summary
95% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Fish And Wildlife Service results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 1,345 hits . Analysis detected 8,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,520 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 77% (13,722 of 57,694 keywords). This US Fish And Wildlife Service is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. US Fish And Wildlife Service
Keyword details
Total words: 6,520
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.2% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 20.6% 20.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst