Keyword summary
95% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Airstrikes results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 1,780 hits . Analysis detected 9,890 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,446 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 51% (29,789 of 59,653 keywords). This Us Airstrikes is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group. Us Airstrikes
Keyword details
Total words: 9,446
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.8% 18.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst