Keyword summary
4% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ultramarathon results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 2.1% saturation with 318 hits . Analysis detected 2,455 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,240 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (56,169 of 56,292 keywords). This Ultramarathon is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. Ultramarathon
Keyword details
Total words: 15,240
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.2% percentile 0.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst