Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Bureau Of Land Management results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 455 hits. Analysis detected 3,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,428 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 43% (34,335 of 59,653 keywords). This U S Bureau Of Land Management is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
U S Bureau Of Land Management
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
43%U S Bureau Of Land Management (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,428
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

42% percentile
025507510042.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos