Keyword summary
66% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Transit Funding results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 1,441 hits . Analysis detected 8,327 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,794 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 37% (36,579 of 57,294 keywords). This Transit Funding is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group. Transit Funding
Keyword details
Total words: 11,794
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst