Keyword summary
22%1 analyzed article/video996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trading Partners results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 1,639 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (44,160 of 54,291 keywords). This Trading Partners is better (less manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Trading Partners
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
19%Trading Partners (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,984
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

19% percentile
025507510018.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos