Author summary
20%1 analyzed article/video996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jemma Crew results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 1,639 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (6,680 of 8,706 authors). This Jemma Crew is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Jemma Crew
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
24%Jemma Crew (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,984
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos