Keyword summary
86%1 analyzed article/video1,101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tipped Minimum Wage results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 594 hits. Analysis detected 4,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 60% (23,952 of 59,609 keywords). This Tipped Minimum Wage is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Tipped Minimum Wage
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
60%Tipped Minimum Wage (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,404
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510059.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.2%10.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos