Author summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 1,101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kurt Huffman results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 594 hits . Analysis detected 4,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,221 of 9,078 authors). This Kurt Huffman is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group. Kurt Huffman
Author details
Total words: 4,404
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.5% 13.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst