Keyword summary
19% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,755 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Time Change results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 493 hits . Analysis detected 5,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,584 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (50,892 of 54,195 keywords). This Time Change is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Time Change
Keyword details
Total words: 12,584
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.1% percentile 1.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst