Keyword summary
54% 1 analyzed article/video 426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Polar Express results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 224 hits . Analysis detected 1,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,704 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 68% (19,504 of 59,653 keywords). This The Polar Express is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group. The Polar Express
Keyword details
Total words: 1,704
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.3% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst