Keyword summary
⁠23%2 analyzed articles/videos2,241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Floods results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 854 hits. Analysis detected 2,920 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,964 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (54,933 of 59,514 keywords). This Texas Floods is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.
Texas Floods
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠8%Texas Floods (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,964
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

8% percentile
02550751007.7% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos