Keyword summary
26% 1 analyzed article/video 1,441 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Death Penalty results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 535 hits . Analysis detected 2,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,764 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (45,915 of 59,756 keywords). This Texas Death Penalty is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Texas Death Penalty
Keyword details
Total words: 5,764
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst