Keyword summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 1,224 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tatmadaw results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 460 hits . Analysis detected 2,119 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 57% (25,935 of 60,144 keywords). This Tatmadaw is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. Tatmadaw
Keyword details
Total words: 3,672
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst