Keyword summary
65% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tarik Skubal results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 1,199 hits . Analysis detected 10,985 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,500 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 25% (44,158 of 58,477 keywords). This Tarik Skubal is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Tarik Skubal
Keyword details
Total words: 14,500
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst