Keyword summary
78%4 analyzed articles/videos2,660 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tanker results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 1,362 hits. Analysis detected 8,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,640 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 48% (29,163 of 55,403 keywords). This Tanker is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Tanker
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
48%Tanker (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,640
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510047.4% percentile
2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate