Keyword summary
95% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Oral Arguments results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,209 hits . Analysis detected 11,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,068 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 56% (23,887 of 53,758 keywords). This Supreme Court Oral Arguments is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Keyword details
Total words: 9,068
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst