Keyword summary
95%2 analyzed articles/videos2,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Oral Arguments results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,209 hits. Analysis detected 11,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,068 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 56% (23,887 of 53,758 keywords). This Supreme Court Oral Arguments is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
56%Supreme Court Oral Arguments (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,068
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.4%10.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.5%10.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos