Keyword summary
30% 2 analyzed articles/videos 690 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stoke Space results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 253 hits . Analysis detected 3,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,917 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (39,258 of 59,661 keywords). This Stoke Space is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group. Stoke Space
Keyword details
Total words: 4,917
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst