Keyword summary
92% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Jobs results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 1,098 hits . Analysis detected 6,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,459 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 58% (24,235 of 57,164 keywords). This Steve Jobs is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Steve Jobs
Keyword details
Total words: 6,459
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst