Keyword summary
16%5 analyzed articles/videos1,908 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Agencies results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 564 hits. Analysis detected 5,116 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,717 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (52,025 of 52,986 keywords). This State Agencies is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.
State Agencies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
2%State Agencies (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751001.8% percentile
0.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate