Keyword summary
63%4 analyzed articles/videos4,029 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Starfield results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,215 hits. Analysis detected 10,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,150 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (42,700 of 59,653 keywords). This Starfield is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Starfield
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
29%Starfield (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 15,150
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510028.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate