Keyword summary
2% 1 analyzed article/video 3,379 analyzed words
BS Summary: These South St Paul results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.2% saturation with 301 hits . Analysis detected 1,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (52,847 of 53,020 keywords). This South St Paul is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. South St Paul
Keyword details
Total words: 13,516
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.3% percentile 0.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst