Author summary
4% 3 analyzed articles/videos 5,283 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katelyn Vue results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.9% saturation with 662 hits . Analysis detected 3,945 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,892 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.4% and a BS Rank of 1% (8,636 of 8,656 authors). This Katelyn Vue is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. Katelyn Vue
Author details
Total words: 22,892
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.2% percentile 0.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles22.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst