Keyword summary
90% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sidney Crosby results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Recency Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 799 hits . Analysis detected 4,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,760 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 58% (25,078 of 59,772 keywords). This Sidney Crosby is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group. Sidney Crosby
Keyword details
Total words: 5,760
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.0% 0.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst