Keyword summary
71% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sean Bean results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 2,170 hits . Analysis detected 10,328 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,296 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 43% (30,523 of 53,050 keywords). This Sean Bean is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group. Sean Bean
Keyword details
Total words: 11,296
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.2% 19.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst