Keyword summary
64%2 analyzed articles/videos1,701 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sci Fi Thriller results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 1,599 hits. Analysis detected 5,874 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,804 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 55% (27,106 of 59,653 keywords). This Sci Fi Thriller is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Sci Fi Thriller
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
55%Sci Fi Thriller (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,804
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510054.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 23.5%23.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos