Keyword summary
17%2 analyzed articles/videos1,119 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Schuylkill River results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 231 hits. Analysis detected 1,558 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,476 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (49,423 of 59,653 keywords). This Schuylkill River is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Schuylkill River
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
18%Schuylkill River (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,476
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510017.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate