Keyword summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Levinson results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Straw Man , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 657 hits . Analysis detected 3,416 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,526 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 52% (28,839 of 59,526 keywords). This Sam Levinson is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group. Sam Levinson
Keyword details
Total words: 4,526
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst