Keyword summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video1,114 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rich Bonner results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 839 hits. Analysis detected 4,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (16,327 of 53,656 keywords). This Rich Bonner is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Rich Bonner
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠70%Rich Bonner (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,456
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510069.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 18.8%18.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos