Keyword summary
62% 2 analyzed articles/videos 699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Queen City results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 463 hits . Analysis detected 1,948 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,796 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 76% (14,610 of 59,653 keywords). This Queen City is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Queen City
Keyword details
Total words: 2,796
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.5% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst