Author summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ethan Bloomfield results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Biased Writer Voice , and Bandwagon , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 271 hits . Analysis detected 1,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 94% (617 of 9,471 authors). This Ethan Bloomfield is worse (more manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group. Ethan Bloomfield
Author details
Total words: 1,216
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.5% percentile 7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 16.7% 16.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 22.3% 22.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.8% 12.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Halo Effect: Author 22.3%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 16.7%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst