Author summary
93%1 analyzed article/video304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ethan Bloomfield results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Bandwagon, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 1,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 94% (617 of 9,471 authors). This Ethan Bloomfield is worse (more manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Ethan Bloomfield
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
94%Ethan Bloomfield (selected)8%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,216
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510093.5% percentile
7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 16.7%16.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 22.3%22.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.8%12.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 8.2%8.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Halo Effect: Author 22.3%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 16.7%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos