Keyword summary
⁠47%2 analyzed articles/videos4,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Princeton results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 1,422 hits. Analysis detected 8,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,688 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (53,821 of 59,389 keywords). This Princeton is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
Princeton
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠10%Princeton (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 19,688
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

9% percentile
02550751009.4% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles19.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.8%5.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos